The
Earth, in its existing condition and with the current behavior of our species, will
be destroyed in time. Humans do not consider the distant future. The only
contemplation of the future done by our species is for a couple years down the
road. We do not see ourselves as a whole, but rather as individuals that do not
play large roles. The consequences of our species’ actions are presently destroying
the wilderness and the Earth. The idea of Island Civilization is one that is
bizarre, and seems to be rather impossible. It will cause much controversy, but
in the long run it will lead to a lasting planet Earth. Saving the planet,
after the trends and behaviors that humans have set is the hardest obstacle for
mankind.
The relationship and how humans view
the world has changed drastically throughout time. In the beginning there was
no wilderness, no area that was uncivilized and untamed. It is when humans
divided themselves between the wild and the civilized that the wilderness
became distinct. Destroying the land and establishing civilization meant
success for much of humankind. As time progressed the way humans viewed nature
began to change and develop. Humans could see the beauty and the fun that the
wilderness held within. This helped the arguments for the preservation of the
wilderness. The humans’ perspective of wilderness changed yet again when they
viewed it as an equivalent. Wilderness was created by God, and therefore should
be treated like so.
Considering what could be in the
future there are many scenarios about the condition of the Earth. For example,
the garden scenario in which humans will have total control over nature. Humans
will have altered every inch of the earth. The diversity will be gone, there
will no longer be untamed and untouched nature. Humans will have officially
tampered with the development and evolution of the planet. Another possible
scenario is called future primitive. In this scenario we will think back on the
technological civilization that we have been striving for as a mistake. The
human race will go back to the hunter and gatherer stage of life. Although this
would help the environment and the earth it would also destroy any chances of
breakthroughs and amazing triumphs.
Overall, Island Civilization would
mean removing the incorporation of civilization in the wilderness. For example,
our homes could be on poles in the mountains where we would not disturb the
natural settings, or underground so as to not clear the land. In order for our
species to accomplish these many high set goals we simply need motivation.
Imagining life living in cramped
quarters on islands in locations that are less than desirable seems miserable
and intolerable. The spoiled lives that our species lives today compared to
what is needed for our species to survive is outrageous. There is no comparison
to the lives we are living today to the lives that we would live if we were to
pursue Island Civilization.
I believe that in order to
successfully accomplish anything that will benefit our planet humans need to
have the motivation. It takes willpower and determination to accomplish
anything. In order to encourage the members of our species to be motivated we
need to educate them and make sure there is total awareness and understanding.
Individuals do not realize that the small deeds they do have an impact on our
planet’s well being. Humans need to see the possible outcomes of our actions.
Even though Island Civilization is
an extreme plan that would steer many away, I believe that it is better than
nothing. I am not sure that the technological civilization that we have created
will ever downsize to Island Civilization, but there are other options. We can
take numerous plans and ideas away from the concept of Island Civilization. There
are less extreme alternatives that would allow our species to adopt new
behaviors and actions that would slowly add to the restoration and survival of
our planet. Island Civilization is an option that our species should be
introduced to. The thought of Island Civilization seems to be impossible. It is
something that would involve the participation and support of the entire world.
Island Civilization would mean changing everyday life to the point of no
recognition. The idea seems to be extremely wild and irrational. However, it is
possible, and it could possibly lead to saving and preserving the Earth.
I enjoyed reading your analysis because you viewed the text very differently from the way I did. For me Island Civilization was inspiring and in a way gave me hope that somehow we could live in a utopia like world, where sustainable living was the norm and destruction did not exist. Nonetheless, the points you made are very rational and breaks through this image that humans have destroyed the wilderness by controlling it. Like you've said our technologies would not be were they are now if it hadn't been to controlling the 'wild'.
ReplyDeleteAlso I was partial to the way you ended your analysis saying "The thought of Island Civilization is to be impossible. It is something that would involve the participation and support of the entire world. Island Civilization would mean changing everyday life to the point of no recognition." It is true that if we desire a world that the author has described we'd have to alter our everyday lives in a way which no one is really willing to do.